adversarial testing
Red team your agents
VisIQ red teams an agent by cloning it into a sealed sandbox, driving real attack techniques against the clone, and grading each one by what the agent actually did. New skills detonate against planted canaries before they run live, and every finding arrives as a proposal for human review.
The clone takes the hits
The test subject is a faithful clone of your production agent: the same instructions, the same tools, the same policy. The clone stands inside a cordon where every tool is a mock, so nothing an attack achieves during the exercise touches a real system.
That separation makes hard attacks affordable. You can let a technique land completely, watch what it gets, and hand the transcript to the team that owns the agent, with production untouched.
Verdicts come from what the agent did
Attack runs drive the clone through real multi-turn exchanges: instructions smuggled into content the agent reads, persuasion campaigns aimed at talking it past a boundary, its own tools turned against their remit with over-broad arguments and chained calls. Each technique carries its MITRE ATLAS id.
The sandbox recomputes every outcome from the agent's actual behavior and ignores what the agent claims about itself. Every technique ends in one of two verdicts: it held, or it demonstrated a weakness. Verdicts land as findings rows in the Red Team view, tied to the exchange that produced them.
Skills detonate in a sealed cell
A newly installed skill is a bundle of instructions, and instructions can hide reaches. Before a skill ever runs live, it is set off inside a sealed test cell stocked with canary tokens: planted secrets, watch-listed personal data, records belonging to another business function, and resources nothing should ever touch.
Every reach the detonating skill makes is observed against those canaries. A probe that stops short is recorded as clear; contact with a canary is the finding. The verdict slip states which canary was reached and confirms the run stayed inside the sandbox.
Every finding waits for a human
A detonation that reaches a canary produces a proposed blacklist entry. Nothing applies it until a reviewer accepts it. An attack-run weakness ships with its evidence attached: the boundary that failed and the exchange that got past it.
The rule change stays a human decision. Both the finding and the decision leave a record you can point to later.